The appointment of Randle, on paper, appeared to be a wise decision. Was this positive news for an organization that has been under scrutiny for many months?
Absolutely not.
On the surface, Randle seemed like a clever signing. For an organization that has been under intense scrutiny for months, could this be seen as good news?
Not at all.
English Translation:
On paper, Randle looked like a shrewd acquisition. Was this positive news for an organization that has been in the crosshairs for many months?
Not in the slightest.
A prima vista, Randle sembrava un acquisto astuto. Notizie positive per un’organizzazione che è sotto i riflettori da molti mesi?
Neanche per sogno.